Skip to content
Close Trigger
  • EN
  • FR
  • NL

UPC Agreement | Internal Competences

  • February 28, 2023
Print this page

Practice(s)

Copyright

Designs

Intellectual property law

Patents

Trademarks, domain names and geographical indications

Author(s)

Emmanuel Cornu

Fernand de Visscher

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook

UPC AGREEMENT | WHAT ARE THE COMPETENCES OF THE UNITED PATENT COURT?

Part 2 | INTERNAL COMPETENCES (BETWEEN UPC MEMBER STATES)

Full  article can be downloaded here.

The introduction of the European patent with unitary effect is accompanied by the creation of a unified patent court with exclusive competences to hear certain actions concerning this new type of patent and some other similar titles. The forthcoming entry into force of the agreement establishing the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) provides an opportunity to discuss here, without going into too much detail, the main rules that will determine the UPC competences in the EU Member States parties to this agreement (“UPC States”). For the other countries, see Part 3.


 

As a reminder, the structure of the UPC has two levels:

  • a Court of Appeal based in Luxembourg and,
  • a Court of First Instance.

 

The Court of First Instance consists of :

  • a central division organised into three sections in Paris, Munich and perhaps Milan (the latter will replace London, due to the Brexit),
  • regional divisions (common to several UPC states; only one has been established so far) and
  • local divisions (specific to one UPC state; no section has been established in some UPC states, e.g. the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Malta and Bulgaria).

 

As a preliminary note, the UPC’s material competences are limited to the actions listed in Article 32 of the UPC agreement (mainly infringement actions, declarations of non-infringement, invalidity actions or actions against decisions of the EPO concerning unitary effect).

Actions outside these competences are handled by national courts and are distributed internationally under the rules-of-competence of the so-called Brussels Ibis Regulation and the Lugano Convention (2007) (which no longer binds the UK).

Titles subject to UPC competences: it should also be recalled that the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”), described as a “common” jurisdiction for the UPC states, has competences to hear disputes concerning:

  • European patents with unitary effect,
  • European patents without unitary effect, except those for which an opt-out has been filed during the transitional period (7 years at least),
  • European patent applications, except those for which an opt-out has been filed during the transitional period,
  • supplementary protection certificates issued for products protected by a European patent (“SPC”), excluding those for which an opt-out has been filed during the transitional period.

 

The following is a brief outline of the rules applicable within the UPC States’ territories to determine the competent division of the UPC Court of First Instance. Some procedural implications are also discussed when there are multiple actions.

| DISTRIBUTION OF DISPUTES WITHIN THE UPC

The parties may, by mutual agreement, bring their disputes falling within the competences of the UPC before any division. An exception is an action against decisions of the EPO (registration of unitary effect), which must always be brought before the central division of the UPC.

Absent such agreement between the parties, the following rules apply:

  • infringement actions may be brought at the option of the claimant:
    • before the local or regional division of the place of infringement,
    • or before the local or regional division of the defendant’s residence or principal place of business or, failing that, one of its places of business,
    • or before the central division, if no local division exists in the territory of the UPC State concerned and said State does not participate in a regional division (this applies e.g. to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg).
  • Counterclaims for invalidity (revocation) brought in response to infringement actions can lead to three possible scenarios:
    • the division itself decides on the infringement action and on the counterclaim,
    • or the division refers the counterclaim to the central division and decides on the infringement action or stays the decision on it (split or so-called “bifurcation“),
    • or the division refers the entire case to the central division, with the agreement of all parties.
      In case of split or bifurcation, the Rules of Procedure provide that the division is obliged to suspend its decision on the infringement action if there is a high probability that the claims of the patent in question will be invalidated by the central division.
  • Main actions for invalidity (revocation) and declaration of non-infringement fall within the competence of the central division.

    However, if an infringement action between the same parties is already pending before a local or regional division in relation to the same patent, these proceedings can only be brought before the same local or regional division. In this case, all three scenarios described in the previous section are possible, including “bifurcation“.If an action for invalidity (revocation) of the patent at stake is already pending before the central division, an action for infringement between the same parties for the same patent may be brought before any division (local, regional or central division). If the defendant then brings a counterclaim for invalidity of the patent, the three scenarios are possible, including splitting the proceedings.

    Unless the parties agree otherwise, the central division must stay proceedings on the invalidity action until the division concerned will decide on how to proceed further. The Rules of Procedure provide that this division must then take into account the state of the nullity action before the central division when deciding how to proceed.

  • An action for declaration of non-infringement before the central division is suspended if, within three months of its launching, an action for infringement of the patent is introduced before a local or regional division.
  • Actions for ‘consideration’ for licences under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 (“de jure” licences) fall within the competence of the local or regional division of the defendant’s residence, principal place of business or one of its places of business.

 

| SPECIAL RULES

An action may be brought before the same division against multiple defendants located in different UPC states only if those defendants have a commercial connection and the action relates to the same alleged infringement.

Situations of lis pendens (different claims between the same parties concerning the same patent) are resolved by a preference rule in favour of the division implicated first.

 


 

For any questions or assistance, please reach out to our Intellectual Property Team | upc@simontbraun.eu

***

This newsletter is not a legal advice or a legal opinion. You should seek advice from a legal counsel of your choice before acting upon any of the information in this newsletter.

 

GET IN TOUCH

  • +32 2 543 70 80
  • info@simontbraun.eu
  • The Hype - Avenue Louise 250 (10)
    1050 Brussels, Belgium

Follow us

Linkedin-in Facebook-f Twitter
Contact us
  • General Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
Menu
  • General Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
made by BLACKT | SIMONT BRAUN © 2023

This website uses cookies

We use cookies on our website to improve functionality and performance and to analyse traffic to the website. You can accept all cookies, reject all cookies or manage your cookie settings using the buttons. You can find more information in our Privacy Policy and in our Cookie Policy.

  • Home
  • About
  • Practices
  • Sectors
  • Lawyers
  • News
  • Home
  • About
  • Practices
  • Sectors
  • Lawyers
  • News

Follow us

  • ESG Values
  • Rankings
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • ESG Values
  • Rankings
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Tel : +32 2 543 70 80
  • info@simontbraun.eu
  • The Hype - Avenue Louise 250 (10) 1050 Bruxelles
PRIVACY PREFERENCE CENTER
Simont Braun

When you visit our website, our website may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly through the use of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mainly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide you with a more personalised web experience. Because we respect your right to data protection, you have the option to choose to accept or reject cookies via the cookie banner. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. More information in our Cookie Policy.

Functional cookies

Functional cookies are necessary for the user to navigate the website. Without these cookies, the website cannot function properly.

Due to their technical necessity, cookies are stored from the moment you access the website. These cookies have a limited lifespan and are automatically deleted at the end of your visit of the website.

Analytical cookies

Analytical cookies collect information about the way the user uses the website.

Simont Braun uses Google Analytics’ audience measurement cookies. These cookies collect data about your navigation on the website (such as time of visit, number of visits, source of arrival, preferences and browsing habits). These cookies are used by Simont Braun to have a better understanding of the behaviour of website users and to generate reports on website usage statistics.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Performance cookies

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the performance of the website or to retain information that will influence the way the website is displayed (the language version).

These cookies contribute to provide you with a better user experience on our website.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance